« The Hole of Fear ( IV ) | Main | Am I Right? (5) »

The Sexual Ego (Part I)

By Jasjit Purewal - 12:03 PM Tuesday 19 September 2006

learning_to_walk.jpg
Per se, dividing the ego into segments is a bad idea. It only manages to complicate and confuse an already complex aspect of human psyche. However my last post on the ego triggered this thought, so here it is. Perhaps because I was trying to figure out whether we can highlight the ego’s hideouts more clearly and actually spot where its operating fields are the most subtle, powerful and also destructive. Voila we return once more to the sexual.

In fact our sexual ‘being’ can be divided into three distinct aspects. Primarily a visible self we carry around called our sexual persona, then the invisible and powerful energy field called our sexual aura (where the electromagnetic and gravitational fields of our intentions and desire work assiduously) and of course the root of it all –our sexual mind. Now we have heard countless people like psychologists, mystics, and sex therapists claim that sex is basically in the mind. Exactly why do we have what we call the sexual mind?

The sexual ego then, is the coding mechanism, which in effect rules and triggers all these other personas. The mind is the hub where sexual ego codes its identity and sets off the persona and the aura and all three together become a powerful sexual satellite, receiving and transmitting all that we know as our sexuality, sexual experiences and desires.

The sexual mind is where childhood onwards, our notions of intimacy are carved. Primarily by mum and dad, siblings (especially the rivalry for affection from parents) teachers, friends, relatives etc. etc. Love, hate, respect, violence, aggression, power, manipulation, merits, rewards all are ceaselessly recorded, as we experience them first hand. This then gets coded as our personal system for defining intimacy in its broadest sense. The mind now (say by age 10) sets up the patterns/reference points on how we will assess, value, choose and manage intimacy through this code.

Sexualization, or the messages, experiences and information that we are exposed to as children, enters this very same intimacy code as our sexual persona. Let me clarify. The sexual is seen and understood as the closest human interaction between two people. It is the final frontier of human intimacy ‘understood’ by the human mind. Therefore as we approach this frontier we bring along with us EVERYTHING that defines our notions of intimacy-fear of rejection, hurt, mistrust, betrayal, low self-esteem the desperate desire to control the other etc. etc.

For example, let us turn to the extreme of child sexual abuse (csa). Any child (boy/girl) having been abused in childhood has picked up the following messages-pain, shock, confusion, shame, guilt, low body image, damaged sense of bodily boundaries, sexual power over an adult, secretiveness of the sexual, vulnerability of adults to this realm of their desire/pleasure and manipulation. But none of these messages are distinct and clear in the child’s mind for they are picked up at a visceral level (which is where the child functions intensely) and VISCERAl is the deepest coding within the sexual mind. Hence it becomes foundational, too deep to be spotted by us even as adult intellects. This visceral self, then gets sparked in every sexual interaction, space thereof and we have a legacy now, which is called our sexualization or our sexual ego. For it hides, manages and manipulates broadly all the sexual fears seeded in childhood.

The most alarming reality is that this self, roots all concepts of sexual pleasure that this individual carries. The proof of this fact is that most unhealed csa victims continue to walk into sexually abusive situations and also have frequent violent fantasies. What we need to understand here is, that the csa does not necessarily have to be physically violent or extreme, it could be even as ‘mild’ s being shown pornography, fondled or, seeing one’s parents or anyone else making love etc. What most people don’t realize is that in this very sexual and dysfunctional world of ours, all of us have been exposed at a very young age to experiences, which have left indelible marks or better still sculpted sexual images, definitions and experiences. These now become our individual link between body and mind, pleasure and pain, pleasure and guilt, pleasure and shame, pleasure and violence/aggression. Since the link between pleasure in the body and the mind does not get sculpted as a linear, healthy space the sexual mind gives birth to the sexual ego. Unaddressed fears/confusions/questions/demons fester at the bottom of this sexual ego

Fear is the root, which begins with the child’s experience/understanding of the mystifying sexual. So it includes shame, guilt, secrecy, anger, violence, aggression, body parts, sensual zones, lying, power games, negotiations, closeness (intimacy), comfort, control over another, rewards and punishments. Using the most common definition of the ego being a cover for fear, it is easy to understand why the sexual ego becomes dense, intensely protective, highly manipulative, very aggressive and extremely excluding.

For instance, we are extremely judgemental ‘sexually’. I know the first reaction of many will be ‘no I am not’ but if we dig a little deeper we will see through history, beginning perhaps from Mary Magdeline being stoned onwards, sexual condemnation has lead to the most intense and violent public outcry’s of rage. Stoning for adultery, hounding prostitutes, hate crimes against homosexuals, murdering wives for ‘betrayal’….nothing brings out violence, anger and public hate quite like the sexual does. Even as these incidents dog us through history, man is naturally inclined to shun and damn them rather than understand what lies at their root. Even today when every kind of sexual ‘idiosyncrasy’ is out there and visible in large numbers.

Paradoxically man’s voyeurism is also at an all time high. Pornography is nothing more than voyeurism. Ostensibly called erotica to stimulate the senses, irrespective of whether it is child porn, bestiality or even snuff porn (where you murder after you mate) the sheer sales of porn make it an economic goliath, which no government has been able to overpower. And as the net becomes the largest playground of porn, especially child porn, we need hardly guess on how commonplace and pervasive is it’s demand. Sexual scandals and content ensure high sales of film and media, is hardly a secret fact.

Voyeur and judge both co-exist in us. And betwixt these two lies the cherished sexual mind. The voyeur self feeds on its ‘uncomfortable’ desires and the judge in us in fact expresses hate at its own fears/darkness. Fear, at the inability to conquer what we perceive are our own sexual demons (desires) makes us want to peer into how ‘sick’ everyone else is and gain comfort in comparison. Small wonder, that while parents can stretch themselves to be ‘understanding’ of our various ‘flaws’ they can be the worst judges on our sexual selves. Mothers handing down Victorian morality to daughters, rarely heed the stifling emotional/intimate truths they have known/struggled with themselves. Their fear of their ‘own’ desires perhaps makes them want to stamp out any possibility of their daughter even harboring any ‘wanton’ thoughts.

This convoluted sexual mind then braces against a world dominated by an amazingly narrow and voyeuristic sexual media. Beauty is clearly defined by the media. Short, fat, dark, pimpled and buck-toothed men and women have no right to have any sexual persona so to speak. Winsome, long-legged women and brawny men ooze the ideal sexual mates and body-image becomes an additional and powerful demon.

As fears triggered through childhood abound in our being, adulthood brings in new sets of standards/experiences to add to our general sexual anxiety and low self –esteem. Visceral confusions/pain of childhood now weave into defined articulate anger and mistrust as adults. This is the realm of the sexual ego. It bars naturalness, spontaneity, beauty and joyous resonance. Its hard drive, the sexual mind, articulates and justifies the cycle of mistrust and denigration. What we see within we reflect outside.

In my next post I will conclude with how this storehouse of sexual ego/mind within then sculpts both our persona and our sexual aura to set the stage for the nature of sexual experiences we have through our life. Nothing comes to us without being ‘invoked’ by our sexual mind and its convoluted desires.


Posted By Jasjit Purewal - 12:03 PM Tuesday 19 September 2006

Comments

Dear Jasjit

I am really amazed at the depth of the intensity of your thought process. In me you have reinforced the belief in myself. I have been enjoying this blog but today i wish to share my thoughts about an incident at the Faculty of Law, delhi University where i am a student in the morning batch. Just a few days back there was an episode of so called `sexual harassment'on the campus of the faculty. A `Bihari guy' asked for a sexual union to a `North eastern girl' That is how ... Bihari and North Eastern .... that most put it while my cosmopolitan psyche first of all failed to register this provincial linguistic bias ....coming to the point ... this guy was spiritually mutilated by everybody slinging mud on him in the name of a sexual crime-verbal here. `Aaj tak drooled over it and lapped up the footage. The girl I heard was comfortably situated in front of the camera while all and sundry reaped mileage out of spotting a cause. When i came to know strangely even as a woman I had my mind and spirit siding the guy though I wasn't present on the day . i wonder why human society has literally ostracized people who talked about sex. This happened with Osho. Asking a woman for sex in its simple pure form is an absolutely lucid expression. why so much hue and cry . A simple straightforward denial would have solved the matter. This stinks of repression. I am one with views on this site about Krishna , Radha and Gopis. I would like to reiterate here that our most robustly spiritual idol Krishna was the greatest lover myth and religion could ever give us . I do not just read the asexual ritualistic spirituality in Radha-Krishna , Krishna - Gopis love but a very very sexual and sensual hue is intended. there. All this embodies the raw spiritual rituals with the soul of sensuality and the mutual bliss at the raptures of sexuality ...spontaneous overflow indeed is this Geet Govinda by Jayadev.

Somewhere down the lane we have lost the connection. And instead of reviving the artistic, spiritual and the blissful we have invoked the mundane , guiltridden definitions of sexuality. How alienating and more so on the campus. I personally think with Jawaharlal Nehru that Universities are our temples. And such ugliness of FIRs and titilation and info-hungry electronic media voyeuristically laps it up. Vulgarity galore. This I am afraid is not feminism at its height but a deep low. Feminism is not anti-men. In fact feminism is most close and dear to a non-dual reality which the fusion in sex induces. So i do not think that any brownie points can be won by such unhealthy tactics. I do think that we should not delay any further the discourse on sexuality on the campus. I am sure we are at the verge of new frontiers of discovering our sexuality. It should be comprehended, talked about . The intended comprehension would address the evolution in the context if new definitions of sexuality.

Posted by

Pratibha Chopra
  on September 29, 2006 04:55 PM

Dear Jasjit ji
An extremely well handled juxtaposition of connections reflecting a perspective that will help many to introspect.

Posted by

Meenakshi Vinay Rai
  on September 29, 2006 05:39 PM

Hi Pratibha,

I have heard so many cases of sexual harrassment having gone unattended in the Law Faculty that even when I read the news first I thought to myself that will teach the guy a lesson and perhaps will allow others also to be careful the next time. I guess my reaction was coming from a pent up anger against the callousness that so far the authorities have shown when incidents of sexual harrasssment have come up.

I think what drove the girl to go to the police was her inability to turn around and say "No I 'll not have sex with you." And I think the problem lays there -the inability in most women to say NO whether it is in the case of sexually intimidating advances or in other areas of life.
Women are fearful of saying NO because they are socialised in such a way that they grow up learning to tolerate, bare demands made of their life.

Somehow I feel women are moulded into this victim mode and thats what prevents them from being bold enough to say NO.

I don't want to comment on how the boy has been ostracized but I'll also say that that does not excuse the young man from making such an advance to a complete stranger.

Posted by

Simran
  on October 3, 2006 12:04 PM

are yu trying to say tht sexual preferences are more a matter of yur mental disposition rather than your genetic make up ...

Posted by

sayan
  on August 3, 2007 04:22 PM

Post a comment



(Note: Your email address will not be displayed on our site)


Remember Me?


Top 10 posts of all time

Syndicate our Site (RSS2.0)

Our Authors

Latest Comments

More Comments...

Opinion Poll

Latest News

World Top Blogs - Blog TopSites
Google
Web www.isitaboutsexblog.com

Related Websights

More...
Disclaimer | Project hosted by IFSHA | Designed by IFSHA Designs
Copyright © 2005 IFSHA and isitaboutsexblog.com. All rights reserved