« The Night of Ecstasy | Main | Attaining Ishwara... »

The myth of virginity

By IdeaSmith - 2:44 PM Monday 30 July 2007

The thing that bothers me is that people confuse virginity with purity and use the first to prove the second. Please, people, let's get this straight: Virginity is physical, purity is spiritual.

Really now, aren't we all adult enough (and that being in terms of having adequate knowledge of human anatomy and scientific breakthroughs as well as the maturity to see the full matter)? Re-virgination sounds like a ghastly concept to me, not just because of the physical implications of being 'stitched up' but also for what an ironical metaphor it is for reality. Patching up a tear to make it as good as new. Note the 'as good as'. What a farce and to what avail? Let's not even get into the reality of a hymen getting torn in sports and other strenuous physical activity.

The presence of an intact hymen doesn't really prove anything, except the fact that the lady's going to be shedding a bit of blood the next time she performs the act. It doesn't tell you that she's been faithful to the man (before he even knew her or not), it doesn't say that she's ladylike or has 'modest values'. Hell, even if you knew for fact that she'd never done it, it doesn't tell you a damn thing about her character.

I re-iterate:

Virginity has got absolutely nothing to do with purity.

Purity....spend a lifetime with a person discovering that...it's the kind of whiteness that can' t be sullied by other people's deeds and misdeeds. It lies deep inside a person's own actions. It's also called character and it takes a helluva lot more than a bleeding tissue to find it.


Posted By IdeaSmith - 2:44 PM Monday 30 July 2007

Comments

You must lookit my novelty before
you can associate looks with intelligence:

I wrote two novels
(with the ISBN).
Take a lookit:

---> stores.lulu.com/fido <---

God bless you.
Be at peace.

Posted by

  on August 25, 2007 06:20 AM

How true. Even today, divorcees and widows have a hard time remarrying because they are not "pure".

Posted by

  on December 31, 2007 01:20 PM

HOW TRUE IS IT?

Posted by

cris
  on April 28, 2008 02:10 PM

so simple and yet soooo complicated

Posted by

  on January 13, 2009 10:43 PM

Post a comment



(Note: Your email address will not be displayed on our site)


Remember Me?


Top 10 posts of all time

Syndicate our Site (RSS2.0)

Our Authors

Latest Comments

More Comments...

Opinion Poll

Latest News

World Top Blogs - Blog TopSites
Google
Web www.isitaboutsexblog.com

Related Websights

More...
Disclaimer | Project hosted by IFSHA | Designed by IFSHA Designs
Copyright © 2005 IFSHA and isitaboutsexblog.com. All rights reserved