« Sexual Fantasy : The Dance Of Desire and Secrecy (Part 1) | Main | Sexual Fantasy: The Dance of Secrecy and Desire (Part 2) »
India is perhaps the only land mass, where this question would not be viewed with suspicion or derision if not outright blasphemy. This in itself makes us more futuristic and ahead of our times than any civilized/modern, culture/nation in the world. People! Just look behind you and see the unbroken chain of Kamasutras, Khajuraho,Tantra (the gift of none other than the inimitable symbol of ‘Truth’ Lord Shiva) and you will discover the Indian spiritual landscape with its central sexual Sphinx. A mystifying, veiled call to search for the heights where your depths seem the darkest!
This is a subject for many articles, many truths, many selves and possibly many lives. However in this piece I would like to concentrate on one of the wonders, which have perhaps gone unnoticed by many. The chain is unbroken, as I suggested, for we had amongst us in the twentieth century a voice, which came as a mystical renaissance, no less, of our sexual/spiritual Sphinx. Osho, the veritable ‘spiritually incorrect mystic’ earned much of his ‘incorrect’ renown for unveiling the smiling Sphinx so to speak. Harnessing unmatched techniques for self-realization, he addressed the sexual from its ubiquitous location in mind/body/spirit rather than weave us through the artifice of sin and denial. Few have known the unmistakable Zen core of his teachings and even fewer understand the revolutionary power of his wisdom. Undeterred, he placed man/woman’s sexual quest, fear, confusion and obsession into the nature/nurture mould rather than the sin/lust doctrine.
For those who have bristled needlessly over the many bizarre titles he was handed, such as Sex Guru, and for those also who have never really read what he said, here are few pearls from his powerful book ‘Sex and Superconsciousness.’ Terse, clear, insightful and expansive his words touch the truth of our hearts and minds. That is if we are receptive.
· “The truth is that sex has not been studied scientifically. No philosophy or science of sex has developed because everyone believed he knew about sex. No one has seen the need for a scripture of sex. This is a very grave mistake by mankind. The day we fully develop a scripture, a science, a complete system of thought on sex, we will produce a new race of humans. Then, there won't be the production of such ugly, insipid, lame and feeble human beings. Sick, weak, dull men won't be seen any more on this earth.We never go deeply into the subject of sex, never reflect upon the practice of sex, never try to get to the bottom of it, never meditate on it -- because of the delusion that we know everything there is to know about it.”
· “I wish to tell you that there is no deeper mystery, no deeper secret, no deeper subject than sex -- in this world and in life itself. We only learned about the atom recently, and the world has undergone a tremendous change. But when we succeed in knowing the atom of sex fully, mankind will enter a new era of wisdom. It is impossible to predict the enormity, the greatness of the heights we may reach when we fathom the process and technique of the creation of life. But one thing can be stated for certain: sex is the most mysterious, most profound, most precious and, at the same time, the most accursed subject; and we are in total darkness about it. We never pay any attention to this important phenomenon. A man goes through the routine of coitus throughout his life, but he does not know what it is.”
· “Those who have researched sex, who have gone deeply into it, who have meditated upon life's manifold experiences, have deduced that if coitus only lasts for one minute a man will desire it again on the next day, but if it can be prolonged for three minutes he will not think of sex for a week to come.
· “In intercourse we are closest to the Creator himself, and his shadow converts us into creators as well. If we approach sex with a pure mind and with a feeling of reverence, we can easily have a glimpse of him. But alas, we approach sex indifferently. We approach sex with an attitude of condemnation, with a feeling of guilt, and we fail to feel the existence of the Creator. “
· “The more one is full of anger, dejected, in torment or in despair, the more one moves into sex. A cheerful man does not chase after sex, but a sorrowful man moves into sex because he sees it as the perfect escape from his unhappiness. But remember, if you approach sex with bitterness, with irritation, with condemnation or in sadness, you will never attain to that contentment, to that realization for which your entire soul thirsts.”
· “Sex is the re-experience of the original unity.
The coupling of a man and a woman has a very deep significance: the ego evaporates in this assimilation of two human beings. A person who really understands the essence of this unity, of this longing for love and oneness, can also comprehend the meaning of yet another kind of unity -- a yogi unites; an ascetic unites; a saint unites; a meditator unites. A person is also united in intercourse: his identity merges with that of the other person, and they become one. In samadhi, a person unites with the whole universe and becomes one with it. In sex there is a merging of two persons, whereas in samadhi, a person loses his identity and becomes one with the universe. A meeting between two persons is temporary, but the union of a person with the universe is eternal.”
· “Sex has lost its original sacredness. The original sense of reverence man had for sex has been tarnished. Sex has degenerated into a mechanical nightmare. And this attitude to sex betrays a subtle violence, in the strict sense of the term. Sex is no longer an experience of love. Sex is no longer a vehicle to sacredness. Sex is no longer a meditative act. And because of this, mankind is falling steadily into an abyss.”
· “Those who tell you never to think about sex are your enemies; they have not allowed you to think about it, to reflect on it. Otherwise, how is it possible that we have not yet developed a rational attitude towards the subject? Furthermore, the people who say that sex has no relation to religion are entirely incorrect, because it is the energy of sex, in a transformed and sublimated form, that enters the realm of religion. The sublimation of this vital energy lifts man to realms about which we know very little. The transformation of his sex energy raises man to a world where there is no death, no sorrow, to a world where there is nothing but joy, pure joy. And anyone who possesses that energy, that life-force, can uplift himself to that realm of joyous, truthful consciousness, to Satchitanand.”
Mystic, muse, oracle or Master; unmindful of laurels and brickbats, Osho lived and breathed light into human dilemmas. He categorically and fearlessly pointed man towards ascension as a whole and not in parts. Modern, for he tirelessly wed the valley and the mountain with “Sex and Superconsciousness,” and Master for he relentlessly pointed to the powerful Zen truth :
“Truth’s naked radiance,
Cut off from the sense and the world,
Shines by itself.
No words for it.”
Posted By Jasjit Purewal - 4:07 PM Wednesday 14 December 2005
I love Osho. What a man. A tight slap on the faces by him to all the keepers, teachers and preachers of morality and virtue.
Posted by
Hi Jasjit, U have mentioned about the 'search for the heights'.What about those who r looking for the height thru the width of life?Is there any other door to superconciousness,for those who do not have sexual experience?
Posted by
Hi Buas
Thanks for your comment. Of course there are many 'other' doors. The fascinating thing about our 'essence' (read superconsciousness) is that it is the ultimate expanse, unfettered and untethered. Entry and exit from this space is therefore unbounded. Myriad lives, forms, identities and what we know as dharmas and karmas are just metaphoric of the many routes/road both in and out. For the purpose of this subject Osho, and many others who point to the Tantric wisdom, start from the sexual only because humanity finds itself most attached/stuck/desolate and unresolved at that level. Monotheistic religions have further messed with everyone's head by claming the sexual to be sinful/evil and the 'devil's' realm. Unveiling it all, as part of Divine play/road is what makes Vedic/Hindu philosophy so truly expansive and scientific. After all if all is Brahman then how can the sexual be anything but Brahman too?
Hope this helps
Cheers!
Posted by
hi jasjit,
i too discovered OSHO recently in a trip to Pune.
Curiosity was substituted with interest as i continued to read his books, mostly his childhood memoirs.
Sex is a doorway to superconciousness. this form of thought and way of life has been practised for hundreds of years , more noticably by the Vamachara branch of Tantra philosophy.
these methods encourage the one undergoing them to bring in the Divine even in the 'dirty practises' for as u have said in a comment...everything is Brahman.
these practises do not condemn pleasure or seeking of power, but ask us to compliment the same with the thought of the Divine.
so a devotee is asked to view sex as a Union with God and automatically sex becomes a form of worship.
the only caution for such practises is that the person may get carried away in indulging in them by losing the original thought process. in such a case, sex melts down to the mechanical and temporary bliss.
not everyone is capable to sustain the original emotion, therefore the masters over the yaars have asked many not to follow the path of sex as a worship because it requires tremendous devotion and will power.
no wonder the the path of sex as a doorway to superconciousness is called " The Hero's Path"
Even Osho teaches the same thing in a different language.
Posted by on December 18, 2005 10:45 AM
So Aachi and Jasjit
What you are sying is that it is only a door to the Superconcious if one sees it as a union to the Divine. While it is a great thing I agree that Indian thought does not isolate the sexual into something dirty and 'unholy' but practically speaking or most people ths sexual is for connecting to another person. Why would they want to channel this to the Divine? I mean then it can't be mcuh fun (I guess) nor leaving you with any sense of sensuality? Am I wrong? Perhaps that's why people don't pay attention to the Divine angle?
Posted by
Aachi
Great post. You have said all and rather concisely. Osho is indeed a great find. He is a reservoir of every concievable spiritual thought/school branding it with his very unique modern metaphor and translation.
Asmita
Good question. While the sexual is indeed the most 'intimate' connection with the 'other' and propels man/woman to perpetually seek it as thus its myriad expressions have also wedded it to some very 'unwholesome' experiences/practices. Both at the level of compulsion/attraction and dissonance it is the single most troubling area of human behaviour. Tantra specifically and Indian thought as a whole provides a powerful door out of the darkness/confusion by explaining its essence and power. For those then, who wish to transform/transcend their cycle of 'obsessions' it provides them a way. Most importantly because it doesn't use the sin/guilt route but largely addreses it as the indivisibility of the sacred and profane. For those who still wish to seek their sensual world through the 'other' it merely leaves them alone. That is the point.
Hope this helps.
Cheers1
Posted by
Very Nice!!
Check my blog : www.cybercommune.blogspot.com
Cheers, Rohit
Posted by on December 19, 2005 10:37 AM
Asmita,
the concept of union with the Divine is unique to the erotic mysticism of ancient Bhakti cults.
the famed promise is that union with the Divine is billion times more 'fun' when compared to normal sex. an example is one given by a recent contemporary saint who said that in Divine union each pore of the body acts like a sex organ and the experience of bliss is elevated to infinity.
sex appraoched for the sake of it one day boils down to the mundane.
when elevated to viewing the union as something more in the superconcious state it becomes the doorway to bliss.
Posted by
This is in response to Asmita's question. Perhaps when we say 'divine' we mean the 'feeling' that we get if and when we unite with the Divine. Its the feeling- of joy, of wholesomness. Its a symbolic way of describing the essence and feeling that sexual union, when conducted with passion and love for the other,can bring in us.
Posted by
Jasjitji
From the level you have answered my question, is so high that I could not reach.
May I request you to simplify it a little bit, so that ordinary people like us can understand and interact.
Hope you do not mind.
Buas
Posted by
Dear Buas
Sorry about that. Let me try again. No the sexual is not the only door to Superconsciousness. There are many doors. Bhakti, Gyan, and Karma being the most popular and commonly referred to as immortalized by Lord Krishna in the Gita. The sexual is a doorway in as much as many look upon it (especially because of the influence of the monotheistic religions)as a 'sinful' aspect of human life. Tantra is the philosophy which clears the guilt/shame aspect to actually reveal it as a mysterious doorway for man's ascension. So it is just one of the ways which as Aachi(above) has commented can be used for transcendence. As there are so many karmas, people and psyches in the world so are there different spiritual paths for each.
Having said that I would like to add that deliberate repression, disgust and rejection of the sexual can defintely act as an obstacle to the highest realms. Only because all is part of the creative Leela and needs to be accepted as such.
Hope this is clearer!
Posted by
I am sorry but I am not understanding this article. Is kamasutra and kahjuraho good you say. Then why Indains are always so narrow minded and telling us that we should not think about sex. How you can reach God through sex if everyone says it is dirty. Please explain me.
Thank you
Posted by
i am here, jasjit..interesting blogspace you have created...as to the title, spirituality is the intent, the attitude we bring in to activities..and sexuality as history and osho have reminded us , definitely qualifies as a doorway...any act can be mundane or deeply elevating depending on the attitude and sensitivity people bring in to it...
Posted by on December 23, 2005 02:08 PM
Jasjit Ji:
I reached you thro the Gur Sabad,as I googled: Mil mere pritama jeo.reading your this post was full of excitement and bliss. It seems you have advanced well ahead on this path.
Read about Sex.very interesting.indepth knowledge.
Guru saab( Sree Guru Granth Sahib Ji) guide us to be true householder: monogamous. The "role of Sex" is limited up to that part only(my evolving understanding)
"If we approach sex with a pure mind and with a feeling of reverence, we can easily have a glimpse of him"
Any approach beyond this "role of sex" is "fir fir junee pa aye"(one comes again and again into the life thro womb: birth and death( transition towards a new birth but misunderstood as death)
Sex cant lead to superconciouness, as it is "trai gunee Maya"( attachment,illusion, ego: Duality) what provides a "glimpse of him" is a mirage effect of realization that we may have got a glimpse of the Ek ONKaar.
Overcoming this Maya (duality): or "humain", is the actual state of being dead yet alive in His will(satguru ji's Hukam), which is when superconciousness is realized. "Pehala maran Kabool Kar"
Guru saab demonstrated, examplifid and educated guru ke sikhs (not sikhs of sikh religion only but all who want to become a learner: sikh)to know how to achieve this true union without sex which is "tri gunee maya"
Please pardon me for nay kid of mistakes, and for putting a different perspective from an evolving mind
Warm Regards
Charan
Posted by
Dear Charan
Sat Sri Akal and welcome to our blog. You found me through a mystifying route but then I do believe that the net is nothing but a superhighway of realizing our dreams/desires/intentions at an awesome speed.
All you say in perfectly true and yet there are many truths beyond it. For even the Guru Granth Sahib is an 'athah samundar' where we all find depth in keeping with our own search/ability. It is within the Guru Granth Sahib ( Guru Nanak Dev's words to be precise) that the ultimate blessing is when one recieves all- 'arth, dharma, kaam and moksha' within a lifetime. However as you say any single thing by itself can lead to becoming a 'narak'. As for moksha, it is only possible to desire it when 'haumein and maya' have exhausted us with their demands.
What I am trying to say is that to look upon any one thing as the doorway to hell is flawed by definition( in my personal understanding). As Gurbaani says 'Nindo nahin kahu batey, eh khasam ka kiya'. So all is as it should be, then rather than reject, fear and lean towards one or the other perhaps we need to be able to contemplate why it is so in the first place.
For me my path took on the more arduous challenge of touching the depths of all that is known as Samsara to understand how trasncendence can be sought through that rather than by avoiding it. Only then I feel can complete freedom be sought.
The sexual is a source not only of unhealthy fears/experiences and moral guilt for all humans but can never be esxperienced in 'balance' precisely because of that. And for that reason alone finding 'balance' is near impossible for most people. At best suppression and denial can happen which in no way is a resolution of any kind. Buddha and OSho's teaching have been pivotal in guiding me to understand that the 'middle' path holds a powerful key. But then the pendulum must first go through both its extremes to find the centre. Don't you agree?
This blog is a modest attempt to prise open the doors of all that hides in darkness under what is practised/experienced/feared as the sexual. It is an attempt to open the door wide enough so that the liberation and the transcendence through it becomes visible. Don't know how successful we are at that? :)
Just want to add that there are indeed many doors. What I write has come from the road I took. It is in no way meant to offend minimize anyone else's truth. And I do hope you will write more often and share your thoughts and insights.
Warm Regards
Posted by
Thanks for the warm welcome, connectivity, Jasjit.
Could you please elabortae more on
"...( Guru Nanak Dev's words to be precise) that the ultimate blessing is when one recieves all- 'arth, dharma, kaam and moksha' within a lifetime." with specific sayings/quotes of Guru Saab which may give me some more clarity before reflecting on your, acumen filled, post.
With Prayers Abound for the continous success of this blog.
Warm Regards
Posted by
Dear Charan
thank You for your blessings for this site :). I am trying to track the whole vakh to write to you the exact meaning of it. Will get back to you once I find it.
warm regards
Posted by
Peace and Greetings to Jasjit, her team,and contributors at "Is It About Sex"
Thank you so much for initiating an interest in me to explore and share some more Gurmat based thoughts about "Arath, Dharam, Kaam, and Mokhsha"
Why Guru uses these four concepts collectively?
Backgground
From The Mahabharata
Santi Parva Section CCXXXVI
Two souls are mentioned in the Vedas and the sciences that is based upon them.
The first (which is called Jivatman;
embodied soul)
is endued with the four attributes already mentioned,
and has a longing for the four objects or purposes (viz.,
1) Religion (Faith)
2) Wealth,
3) Pleasure, (Sex) and
4) Emancipation.
This soul is called Manifest,
and it is born of the Unmanifest (Supreme Soul).
It is both intelligent and non-intelligent. I have thus told thee about
Sattwa (inert matter) and
Kshetrajna (immaterial spirit).
Both kinds of Soul, it is said in the Vedas, become attached to objects of the senses.
----------------------------------------------------
Use of these four objectives, motivations,"Arath, Dharam, Kaam, and Mokhsha" collectively seems to be for following reasons:
1) The one Universal Creator is the only giver of all these worldly sought after objectives
2) when we sing His glory, praises, these may be blessed if we want but should we want these and feel contented is a merit question
3) Thus the true devotee Guru Says doesn't long for these
4) Since these four objectives were sought by many treading the path of spirituality at that time and even now so Guru uses these collectively too
Dharam arath ar kaam mokh daytay nahee baar. ||2||
He does not hesitate to bless me with Dharmic faith, wealth, sexual success
and liberation. ||2||
bhagat araaDheh ayk rang gobind gupaal.
The devotees worship and adore the Lord of the Universe with single-minded love.Ang 816, Rom 15,bilaaval mehlaa 5 Sree Guru Granth Sahib,(SGGS)
Dharam arath sabh kaam mokh hai jan peechhai lag firtha-ee. ||1|| rahaa-o.
Dharmic Faith, wealth, Sex,( pleasure, success), and salvation, all walk like shadow after the Lord's slave. Pause. (Ang1320, Rom 7,kali-aan mehlaa 4,SGGS)
---------------
The purpose of life what Guru says
raaj na chaaha-o mukat na chaaha-o man pareet charan kamlaaray.
I do not seek power (Dharam ,Arath, Kaam or Moksha even) I do not seek liberation. My mind is in love with Your Lotus Feet.
Ang:534 Rom:4 Dayv-Gandhaaree, Fifth Mehl, SGGS
It seems starting from the first to the Mokhsa Guru has dicarded these as a worth pursuing objectives
I would appreciate more discussion on the usefulness of pursuing these objectives of Dharam, Arath, Kaam and Mokhsha
With Prayers Abound
Charan
------------------------
reference Sources
From The Mahabharata
Santi Parva Section CCXXXVI
Translated by Sri Kisari Mohan Ganguli
http colon back slash back slashwww dot hinduism dot co dot zaback slash soul&its dot htm
www dot srigranth dot org
Posted by
Dear Charan
Greetings! Sorry for the belated response but I have been away from the blog for a few days. Thank You for the comprehensive citations on 'arth, dharam. kama, moksha'. Much as I have tried to find the whole vakh I was referring to, it has been elusive and is yet to be spotted by me. However I remember that the first time I visited Nankana Sahib many years ago, I read a vakh from the Grath Sahib there for myself. These four words were referred to as the entirety of a complete blessing. Subsequently in in my search I found the reference to all four in many texts in different contexts.
What i understand today is that all four represent the four poles of Mahamaya's universe. All must be journeyed through by each soul for completion. Beyond them lies true liberation. But for that neither can be circumvented. To be scaled for their heights, their depths must be known first or transcendence is not possible. It is then that true leela (play) can be known.
In that Krishna is a true embodiment for he encomapsses all four and yet one cannot help but observe the leelaswaroop with which he engages with them. That is why I guess tha Mahabharta is such an intrinsic reference for all four. For within the Mahabharta is the Bhagvad Gita (Immortal Song)for it is the song of Leela. And Arjun, the warrior self we must all invoke, who faces the challenge of his/her consciousness (Krishna) on the chariot of his manifest life. Arth(worldy possessions) have brought Arjuna to the battlefield, Dharma (his spiritual discipline) challenges him as Gurus,cousins, elders and father figures make-up the enemy he must strike to kill. The paradox of right and wrong spirngs up for him amdist the confrontation and all his notions of dharma are challenged and he has to rise the highest calling of individual dharma and leave behind collective dharmic notions (Such as loyalty to Guru, obedience to elders and love for family). Kama or the invoilable laws of intimacy (in this case Draupadi's role in being the trigger to his Mahabharta)and finally Moksha or his notion of liberation are all at stake, tested, played out and purified right there. Krishna therefore plays the most unorthodox role as consciousness for Arjuna, because he bends every rule that Arjuna has held dear. That is the reference to where true transcendence lies at the absolute level. But for that Arjuna must stand amidst the four-arth, dharma, kama moksha- knowing and living them as he does.
Just my simple insight into these eternal wonders that we all must walk.
Much love
Posted by
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Great title! Never heard of it before though I have heard of Osho, sounds like he said some pretty amazing things. I'm going to read this book and then maybe I'll come back and comment some more.
Cheers!