« Is Anyone There? | Main | Body Love »

Rakhi Sawant Just Makes Me Wonder

By Chaitali Dasgupta - 5:13 PM Thursday 15 June 2006

untitled2.bmp

Is there something subtle about the Rakhi Sawant story? She’s the ‘item’ (shows lots of skin and gyrates to ‘hot’ numbers on screen and live) girl who stormed 24x7 news channels a few days ago. The story is that pop singer Mika had a birthday bash, invited Rakhi and during the party grabbed her and kissed her on the mouth, bit her lips and broke her earring in his aggressive sexual enthusiasm. Outraged, Rakhi filed a case against him and the rest is news.

Nothing subtle so far! But when one looks carefully at the package that the incident delivers the messages look fairly ominous.

One the one hand is the newbie culture of item girls. Popularized by the ubiquitous trend-setter Bollywood, ‘item’ numbers have become fool-proof crowd pullers in any film, even fairly serious ones. Scanty clothes, provocative dance movements, and totally suggestive and wild lyrics. The ‘I’m available’ girl has taken over all moral, traditional and conservative mind sets and rocketed to such fame, that music videos, regional language films and live entertainment shows have declared them the ‘hottest’ item since talking movies. Not surprisingly, to fill the post, young, nubile women flock to find their place in the sun. The glitz, the money, the fans and the fame, why would they not?

They have literally created the new ‘sexy’ kitsch where even old haunting melodies of great film classics are being remixed to launch a ‘Baby Doll’ or a Rakhi Sawant. The music industry rakes in moolah, and the trend spins onto a whole class of second-rung starlets, who perform them in dancing-bars, weddings, even live shows in small towns. Ensuring that they are no-longer ‘populist’ within a class or region. Bare, nubile women on stage are the frontrunners of India’s sexual bandwagon.

Let’s now look at how legit the ‘baring-all’ girl is today. No longer does she crawl into an exploitative industry from some seamy, vulnerable background. Instead many of the ‘item’ girls are from middle and even upper-class families. Is that not a significant statement on how sexual mores have changed? If families are encouraging daughters to appear on the screen and stage, with even less on than what just a few years ago would have earned them the name ‘whore/ prostitute’ how has India suddenly undergone this very radical change so quickly and seamlessly?

I guess the question of whether it is all truly seamless, is what brings Rakhi Sawant’s episode centre stage. The media, especially electronic media, in their new found avatar as ‘masala’ (spice) chasers, vie shamelessly with each other to bring, sex and violence in sordid detail to the viewers. Their motto: the spicier the better. Truth, ethics and righteousness have seriously been damaged, as the worst face of paparazzi becomes ‘rigorous reporting’ on Indian T.V. Rakshi Sawant’s episode brought that out in no uncertain terms.

Star- News for instance titled it ‘Breaking News’ and flashed the story repeatedly for nearly four hours (including prime time). Meanwhile bomb blast deaths in J& K that day were merely ticker news. More importantly the reporting has a serious slant. All alongside, a picture of Rakhi is being flashed where she pecks Mika’s cheek as she wishes him Happy Birthday. Not once is the picture of his aggressive kiss shown, despite her protests. That picture is aired the next day after the police files an FIR against Mika. But what the news channels do report obsessively are the file photos of Raki in her ‘bare-it-all’ costumes. CNN/IBN too arranges a panel discussion on Rakhi where first ‘sexy’ scenes from various films are being shown with different near nude actresses, as the discussion gets underway.

The message is clear, ‘item’ girls and the new nudity-is-o.k-on-screen culture explains men’s sexual aggression. The Star news reporter went a step further to ask Rakhi repeatedly ‘when you kissed him on the cheek why are you upset that he kissed you on the mouth’. Her repeated explanation that a birthday greeting and a violent kiss on the mouth are two totally different issues seemed to go unheard, because the question was repeated ad nauseum to her. CNN/IBN’s Rajdeep Sardesai felt it was more important to bring in the fact that she had a controversy in Maharastra recently, where some moral police had filed a case against her for appearing on stage in what they called ‘obscene clothes’. How the two were related was confusing the articulate Rakhi until the reporter came out and said clearly ‘aren’t you doing this for publicity?’ To which the clear-headed woman responded, “I have enough fame and glamour in my life why would I report assault for publicity?”

The media response has been fairly clear, rather than report they have tagged their ‘news’ in an unambiguous outline which says:

a) She provoked him by kissing him first.

b) She left herself open to such action by her clothes and demeanour.

c) Her accusation is false as she is an item girl.

Big-wigs in the entertainment industry were quoted and out came the age-old clichés which question the woman and her character when it comes to charges of molestation and rape and women included were quoted as saying, ‘Sawant kissed him first. She should have been sporting when he reciprocated.’ Or ‘I refuse to believe Mika could have done something like this.’

All this makes me wonder how different are these modern day news channels from the more institutional spaces, where even today women’s assertion of their sexual boundaries is dependent on a proof of their character and profession? I wonder if this debate does not take us back to the basic one of whether a sex worker has a right to shout ‘rape’?

I wonder where is the moral police when the endless titillating numbers are endlessly flashed on T.V and movies screens? I wonder what it is about a woman who is on the one hand a ‘hot sexy number’, sought after by whistling crowds and yet when she steps out of her ‘professional skin’ and wants her space to be respected she is shunned so aggressively?

I wonder if there’s something wrong with these women, who step into these roles and don't create enough safety nets for when the crowds turn on them? I wonder where a Rakhi Sawant finds the courage and spark in her eyes to fight for her truth when the majority screams back 'liar' and ‘tease’? I wonder why even today there are so few people who speak up for her and the masses just turn away? I wonder in a public event like Mika’s birthday, with scores of media present how everyone has fallen silent? I wonder if ‘item’ girls ever wonder how their fans really perceive them?

I wonder how many know that what we are facing is not a sexual revolution but a sexual schizophrenia?


Posted By Chaitali Dasgupta - 5:13 PM Thursday 15 June 2006

Comments

Never thought about it earlier Chaitali. But the last line that you have written suddenly seems to be so true. Indeed it is Sexual schizophrenia and not sexual revolution.

Whenever news about Item girls come up in the media I used to find myself at a loss trying to ask myself what would be my opinion if somebody asked me about them. I would find my mind going in all directions. Different voices would be speaking in my mind. Some for them and some against them. I would congratulate them for their confident attitude and at the same time be angry with them for being part of the voyeristic gaze, 'inviting' trouble. When I would be thinking of the latter I would also feel guilty for falling into the same cliche that you have spoken about.

Have been watching the news lately and you are right there seems to be no news about the sex scandal and the use of minors in prostitution in J and K. But spicy hot story about Rakhi Sawant is breaking news, and topic for polls!

Reading the article I realized the hypocricy of it all. As long as the woman says it's my body, I'll do whatever I want with it etc. etc. it's all great and the media is quick to air these views. Reason it gives everyone the voyeristic pleasure of this 'open' female body. But the moment she says 'But I have my boundaries and I don't want anybody crossing that line' the same media and others go into a frenzy because now all the voyeristic pleasure has been taken away with the woman voicing her rights. Urgh It's really infuriating.

It's the clarity, as you have put it, of Rakhi Sawant which is throwing people into this uncomfort. They just can't digest that an 'Item Girl' is speaking of sexual boundaries much unlike the earlier ones. I remember reading somewhere the lines 'I think therefore I'm dangerous.' and so is the case be it of Rakhi Sawant, of a sex worker, of the bar girls, of a rape victim....

Posted by

Annie
  on June 16, 2006 11:08 AM

Dear Chaitali

I'm soooglad you have written this post. I was just burning up with rage when I saw what was being aired by T.V as 'breaking news' on Rakhi Sawant. Like for 2 days they did not show the shot of Mika brutalizing her but went on and on with her peck. and anyone with half a brain can see she looks shocked and is trying to push him off. What gives...

I agree Rakhi has shown gr8 spunk when everyone is just mocking her. And I love your wonderings :) I just wish these 'item' women get it and either stop this naked stuff or just demand a strong forum of support and legal action against such men. Like this is a professional hazard for them so why don't they get it together. That's it, women just never get it that they need to build support for each other.
You should send Rakhi this article. She needs it!

Posted by

Ananya
  on June 16, 2006 05:36 PM

Dear chatali,
Only the woman is being blamed for everything in India.I have read many columns about this issue from various sources,but no one symphatizes with the girl.They say because she dressed like that she deserved it.Or because she does item numbers she deserves it.When will the Indian populace understand how you dress is only a small aspect of your personality.It does not predict the inner nature of a woman.The movie industry should just ban censorship in the first place.There is no need for it.Movies/videos have become quite bold.The double standard used in the movie/t.v media is too much...

Posted by

  on June 17, 2006 06:31 AM

Yes I agree with all your questions and also that we are in schizophrenia as far as sex is concerned. As a parent I feel there is so much confusion in messages that I wonder when my kids grow up who will they really be. I mean my wife and I are fairly liberal people but will my teenage daughter's wish to act in an MTV number be o.k (if its still cool by the time she grows up). The problem I feel is we are not thinking as parents about what is happening. And those that you call 'moral police' are some crazy religious louts who have no moorings in my opinion. Parents, teachers and other guardians of children need to talk about our society and what is to be done. Until that happens the schizophrenia will get worse.

Yes the Sawant girl is made a scapegoat
and she is brave to try to fight like this. But I also feel the question gets confused by the way things are.

Good site, keep it up.

Posted by

Subbu
  on June 17, 2006 10:53 AM

Hi Annie, Diya, Ananya,

Annie I agree with you on the voyeristic nature of the media when it comes to issues related to women.

Ananya yes it is unfortunate that women too play along with these biases and as Annie has said they too allow themselves to become a victim of the voyeristic gaze.

And lets not forget professional competition. One of the woman who spoke against Rakhi Sawant was another 'Item' Girl. One would have expected that she would side with Sawant.

Perhaps Sawant has set a milestone for other women to wake up and voice their protest. Infact she said a very interesting thing to the media. She asked whether their reaction would have been the same if instead of her it was Aishwarya Rai or the likes.

Diya I think that instead of banning censorship what is more important is using the censorship responsibily and in a non-biased manner.

It is a pity to see news channels with well known journalists and reporters playing along with the blame game just for creating 'sensational news.'

Posted by

Chaitali
  on June 17, 2006 10:54 AM

Dear Chaitali,
It was a very interesting read and I could identify the rambling which are going on in my own home are more or less the same, people at large have been feeling.

Rakhi is the bad gal becoz she allows lots of skin show, she kisses many people in front of video(in films) and it was a gimmick to gain popularity.

I find there is a dichotomy in our views when we talk about 'other'woman's body and body of one of our own daughter/friend/sister...

Do we see the same act with same emotions(rather no emtions)when one of ur own 'darlings' get abused by someone despite the fact that she is an outgoing, 'butterfly' kind of person???

The problem is that a huge mass of educated peple believe that Rakhi was wrong and she actually provoked Mika.
Now the question is that this is just a tip of the volcano (I dare not say it iceberger)and we need to address the issue at the most fundamnetal level, where people can see the things the way thy are and can respect a persons sexuality and sexual boundaries irrespective of her profession/hobbies/choices/dressing,etc.
And the million dollar question is how to start that???

In my surroundings it is still believed that if I am engaged I should not wear Jeans and skirts, should prepare myself to wear sarees.

Tell me when such is the scene in a middle class well educated urban family, what reaction is expected from such media -pickels???
I am waiting for your response.


Posted by

Ritu
  on June 23, 2006 03:37 PM

Hi Ritu,

I think we have a lot to learn from Rakhi Sawant. Despite the immense media pressure and the usual bantering and accusations that people have been hurling at her she remains unperturbed and undeterred. She is clear on her stand about her sexual boundaries and its limits.

The answer for the million dollar question is start with yourself. You have to be comfortable with your sexuality and clear about your sexual boundaries. I f our notion of sexuality revolves around wearing jeans , skirts or sarees how different are we from the others? Are we also then not caught in the sexual schizophrenia?

Posted by

Chaitali
  on June 23, 2006 05:07 PM

Miss Chaitali Dasgupta ,
Yes She was Dressed provactively . yes . but do women go on kissing rampage? . Maybe yes it may have been done for publicity . if not then mika is sure the guilty . and woman most of the time kiss affectionately . thats what difference between man and woman . A peck on the cheek isnt provocative as what mika did .

Posted by

Dude
  on June 23, 2006 05:44 PM

(qoute : Commenting on the "forced kiss" pop singer Mika Singh reportedly planted on item girl Rakhi Sawant, Tanushree said "I can't say who is guilty and or responsible for all this but every woman, actress and model needs to be conscious about what they wear and which party they are going to attend".

On people from the modelling world being in the news for drug abuse, she said "despite being a model and part of the industry, I have never come across such things because I am a very conservative girl".) thats sounds it the woman is not all evil and bad .

Posted by

dudecool
  on June 23, 2006 09:22 PM

Thank you very much, i think that is the very legitimate start and I should start from there only.

Posted by

Ritu
  on June 24, 2006 01:02 PM

Woman is v--- of all evil

Posted by

funny guy
  on June 25, 2006 09:10 AM

i love my sexy friend

Posted by

  on June 26, 2006 12:47 PM

I will say that doing sex is different from looking sexy.Some women wear short skirts jeans,that the reason that they are being raped .If you look hot like tanushree,then u should know she is famous and she cannot be rape by someone.U should wear jeans and sarees both should be carefull.

Posted by

  on December 3, 2006 08:42 PM

I will say that doing sex is different from looking sexy.Some women wear short skirts jeans,that the reason that they are being raped .If you look hot like tanushree,then u should know she is famous and she cannot be rape by someone.U should wear jeans and sarees both should be carefull.

Posted by

  on December 3, 2006 08:46 PM

Its all back to the same thing, isn't it? Cover up and we're teases. Be bold and we're whores. Either way its our fault.

Good post, Chaitali.

Posted by

Ramya
  on December 24, 2006 12:20 PM

hi raki i see u in big boss u hsanband is sooooooooooooooo cute

Posted by

arifa
  on January 29, 2007 11:46 AM

Hi, rakhi show us smthng bold

Posted by

Rana
  on February 9, 2007 12:37 AM

There is a news that rakhi sawant was initialy rakesh sawant and had a sex change.

Posted by

Yash
  on April 1, 2007 07:42 PM

Dear Chaitali,
Today for the first time i came across ur write up.I am not good enough to make any comment on the piece from a veteren writer like you but from a layman's point of view,it seems to me that you are deeply influenced by female chauvinist ideology.Dear friend its very much true that the Indian women of present day are much wiser ane successful then the men are,this can easily be made out by increasing number of women in civil and other services.But whatever it may be a,a woman is a woman and this distinction has been created by the creator himself,and a bad name if brought to her,remains with her till death.As was aired by various news channels,the footage clearly showed that it was all pre planned and nothing more than a publicity stunt by both Rakhi and Mika.If an Indian woman would be kissed like Rakhi was,she would never go around the room,laughing and pretending that she expected it,as Rakhi did after Mika kissed her.A true Indian woman would instead cry,scream or slap the guy.I agree to you that the matter was too much hyped but that cant be an alibi for woman like Rakhi..

Posted by

Khawar Khan
  on June 26, 2007 09:53 AM

Post a comment



(Note: Your email address will not be displayed on our site)


Remember Me?


Top 10 posts of all time

Syndicate our Site (RSS2.0)

Our Authors

Latest Comments

  • cris
      commented ( 2:10 PM Monday 28 April 2008) on
    HOW TRUE IS IT?
  • vijaya rajagopal
      commented ( 2:20 PM Sunday 16 March 2008) on
    how you see the it depends on that the spirituality would like to know more about this subject
  • Mieke
      commented ( 4:57 PM Monday 10 March 2008) on
    Dear Aachi, Thanks, found the book but haven't any idea how to order it from them, because it is only ...
  • Harb
      commented ( 4:00 PM Monday 10 March 2008) on
    Aachi, please write at the following email address: harb_singh@yahoo.com
  • Aachi
      commented (12:18 PM Monday 10 March 2008) on
    Dear Mieke, Harb, Lots of love to you.:) The book is in the Young Adult Fiction category of wisdomtree. Harb, ...
  • Mieke
      commented ( 5:17 PM Saturday 08 March 2008) on
    Hi Harb, I have been reading the blog just now. This one on one conversation is very straightforward and I ...
  • Mieke
      commented ( 5:15 PM Saturday 08 March 2008) on
    Dear Aachi, This is certainly a wonderful verse, straight from the heartphone :) Life, in all it's simplicity mostly offers ...
More Comments...

Opinion Poll

Latest News

World Top Blogs - Blog TopSites
Google
Web www.isitaboutsexblog.com

Related Websights

More...
Disclaimer | Project hosted by IFSHA | Designed by IFSHA Designs
Copyright © 2005 IFSHA and isitaboutsexblog.com. All rights reserved