« Bringing the Debate To the Table | Main | Gift Givers and Bug Chasers »

Laws of Attraction

By Anusheh Hussain - 11:22 PM Saturday 08 April 2006

bad attraction.jpg

Research over the years has shown great insight into the area of human relationship, especially the laws of attraction. Deborah Blum for example in her book, Sex On The Brain, talks about how research conducted with men and women showed that they were likely to be attracted to men/women who had the exact opposite immune system, so as to ensure the health of their offspring.

We know it as infatuation and chemistry. Something suddenly sweeps us off our feet, or if you’re not that dramatic then it just catches your eye, intrigues you and pulls you to a particular person. You may not always be able to put your finger on exactly what attracts you to that particular individual but you know they have your attention.

Infatuation and chemistry are essentially the same thing but they may be far more complex than you have actually ever thought.

Recently I came across an article:

“According to Dr. Harville Hendrix in his book “Keeping the Love You Find” chemistry or infatuation is actually an attraction to a person who combines:

- “The worst traits of our parents or childhood care takers to
infatuate us;”
- “The negative traits that infatuate us and we possess but deny in
ourselves;”
- “The traits that we find infatuating but have been repressed in us
by our upbringing;”
- “The infatuating traits that society denies our gender.”


According to him, the person we find ourselves infatuated with, is in fact the last thing we would consciously want!

“Hendrix says we all seek our "Imago," an unconscious image of the person our
childhood programmed us to fall in love or become infatuated with. The
Imago is like a homing device that drives us to repeat ourselves, choosing
over and over the facsimiles of our caretakers' worst traits.

When we find ourselves saying, "You're just like my father (mother)," this
person who infatuates us is our Imago match.

For example, a man who is seeking a submissive woman, just like the one that
married good ol' Dad, is attracted to a woman at a party. Infatuation
strikes!

“Why?”

He is unconsciously attracted to the way the woman demurely lowers her eyes when she is speaking; the way she is so agreeable.

He begins a conversation and infatuation strikes them both.

She is unconsciously attracted to his power stance and his take-charge air of authority. In short, he reminds her of her father, a no-nonsense, ruler-of-the-realm. You know, the one she could never please.

He protectively puts his arm around her; she nestles his head on his shoulder. Together they contemplate true love and happiness forever. Love? No, chemistry and infatuation!

We also seek an Imago who possesses traits of our "Denied Self." These are negative traits from our parents that we cannot bear to recognize in our own behavior.

Hendrix states, "The anger that is so unsettling in your partner was unconsciously chosen by you not only because it reminds you of your mother, but to substitute for the anger you cannot admit to in yourself. Your
perception of that anger is at least in part a projection onto your partner of your own inadmissible anger."

By choosing a partner with the traits we deny in ourselves such as compassion or aggression, we can be a whole person without having to take responsibility for aspects of ourselves that make us uncomfortable. We seek
in another person those traits that have been buried and repressed in ourselves.

Romantic love or infatuation is really the "king of self-love." It stems from a desire for self-gratification, not love. Part of what we fall in love with is our lost or buried self.

In short, romantic infatuation is an illusion of being in love with another person. In reality, we are in love with our missing selves. We are seeking fulfillment of our expectations by what our mate/lover can give us through
association.

We unconsciously want our parents back. We then strive to get the desired results we missed as children and make whole our lost or denied selves.

In other words, chemistry is quite insulting.

Other psychologists have added that at least part of infatuation is buried memories of the first times we had actual contact of a sexual nature, even a quick fondle behind the barn.

We all recall our first dance. As women, we remember the way his hair was combed back from his forehead and the way he held us kind-of close. As men, we remember the way she smiled so sweetly and how she felt in our arms. Long after names are forgotten, those memories become part of "chemistry" or infatuation. Psychologists have said for years that behavior that is learned can be unlearned. However, most psychologists agree that the
illusions that cause us to become infatuated are quite powerful and would not be easy to relearn.”

Can you identify these patterns in your life? Do you find yourself attracted to all the wrong people? Can you spot your parent in your partner?


Posted By Anusheh Hussain - 11:22 PM Saturday 08 April 2006

Comments

hi anusheh, all attraction is finally the attraction to REalize the onenness from which we once began, and which is finally found within.

in between, depending upon on which rung of the evolutionary ladder - or of our dear kundlini - we are, we get attracted to a persons physicality, feelings, intellect and intelligence.

btw, in interesting picture is being shown at star gold just now in which my favourtie hero too is working. so bye for now, more later.

Posted by

Harb
  on April 9, 2006 12:09 AM

sorry the picture just ended...you would have seen it to believe it..it ended with exactly the picture put up by anusheh on her most celebrated of threads...

anyway, to continue the above message on attraction...

now since the oneness can only be realized by going beyond the senses, feeings, intellect and intelligence to that which in fact houses them, eventually we will have to transcend all these attractions to reach it and by then we will come back to ourselves to find that it in fact is not separate from ourselves... all will become one...

yet, i think reaching back to our parents is also in some way correct. by reaching to our parents we eventually try to reach back to the Parent of Them All - the One or Oneness, the ultimate union of Male Parent and the Female Parent.

Posted by

Harb
  on April 9, 2006 12:26 AM

Hi Harb

You've put it very well and I do agree that ultimately all relating originates from the soul desiring that experience of oneness with the self.

However trapped as we all are in our illusory (but very real to us) selves, parents have to be returned to because that remains to be the first stage where all our patterns, expectations and desires are born and we are conditioned to the illusion of 'relating' to the other. To return to the 'original' parent then surely you have to move beyond the illusory parents? What do you think?

Posted by

Anusheh
  on April 9, 2006 12:17 PM

Harb the pig has begun to haunt you. lol Were you seeing Babes -the pig film. If you haven't seen it you must. It's adorable!

Posted by

Anusheh
  on April 9, 2006 12:20 PM

Hi Anusheh and everyone

Have been reading everyday but been too busy to write. This piece caught my attention. If I truthfully look at V I have to admit that what initially attracted me to him was how like my own Daddy, he was so upright and honest. On the flip side he can also be as stubborn as him. A trait which irritated me as a child and now as an adult in marriage. Fascinating article which really got me thinking. Is there nothing that is truely just original about us?

Posted by

Radhika
  on April 9, 2006 12:32 PM

Hi Guys and Gals!

Anusheh I'm not going to comment on the article right now. I've read it in a hurry but got the key points. So let me first try and see if my ex boyfriend had traits that I didn't like in my parents or the other things that you have mentioned. I'll be back then.

Posted by

Annie
  on April 9, 2006 02:03 PM

So true Anusheh. It is all about feeling 'complete'. And I guess thats where the 'need' for the other crops up. The feeling of being at a loss without the other. Ideally we should all find ourselves first, feel whole within and then what we will feel will truly be LOVE. Am I right? :-)

Posted by

Shubhosree
  on April 9, 2006 03:28 PM

yes, anusheh, you are right. we have to pass through many illusory parents/parental attractions, and by the time we are ready to reach the original parent people begin saying that we were born to a virgin...that some 'light' pregnated our mothers...this much at least for the fathers.

and as for the mothers...perhaps those are indispensable as long as we have solid bodies with us. though i am of the opinion that at some stage mothers too are done away with in a similar way. it is an other matter that by that time w would be some other species...

as for the picture i dont know the name. in fact my servant was seeing it at my tv just as i was writing and inbetween i will have a look. i will keep this name Babes in mind so as not to miss it when it comes again. though the film was about many many animals and not just our pig.

Posted by

Harb
  on April 9, 2006 03:32 PM

Shubhz

Ideally, yes. However as reality goes the definition and understanding of loving the self is also very vague and often misunderstood by most people. It is often just the ego misconstrued to be love.

Posted by

Anusheh
  on April 10, 2006 11:40 AM

First Anusheh where did you get such an apt image for the post?!

Second the post sent my head scurrying for the traits that I see in my parents and in my partner and in the others who surround me.

It's true the the triats that we like/dislike in our paretns play a role in the attraction game.

For example (I hope my dad does not read this!) my dad was not the kind who enjoyed taking part in assisting in household chores. So I always wanted to have a partner who would not be like my father in such matters. Lol and behold I was attracted to Gaurav who is just the opposite in this matter.

Not to be unfair to my dad here's how my mom's traits come in the role of the subconscious in me- My mom is a very organised person and (I hope even she does not read this :) ) a person who would want to do all the 1000 chores that is their in a span of 24 hours as if tomorrow did not exist (she is a firm believer in kabir's kal kare so aaj kar aaj kare so ab par mein praley ho jaye....). This really irritated me. But yes you have guessed right... my partner though a great great great help to me is also like my dear mum...

Now that I write this I find it all so funny. Thanx Anusheh. Things are so much clear now and that makes all this so much more amusing.

Annexure: Now it's even more clear why my mom and gaurav get along so well ;) and I now sympathize with my dad ;) But I guess both my mom and dad complimented each other in their own opposite ways- with my dad's patience and my mom's organised work they have made a wonderful family for me and my sis.

Posted by

Chaitali
  on April 10, 2006 12:38 PM


Dear Anusheh & Jasjit (ji)
We are back after a month's break in Calcutta!!!
Two words 'Chemistry' and 'infatuation', we have heard so many times but never thought could be correlated.
Yes, in the past we were attracted to the wrong people, but we thought the reason could be we used to believe their images ( what they projected).
Anyway lovely piece !!
Love
Buas

Posted by

Buas
  on April 10, 2006 04:03 PM

Dear Buas

Great to have you back:-) Hope you had a great trip!

lots of love

Posted by

Anusheh
  on April 10, 2006 04:04 PM

Hi Buas,

Good to have you back! Two months in Cal wow! When it comes to attraction it's the food and the warm, friendly atmosphere in Cal that attracts me to go to her every year, even if it is for a few days.

C u on the blog!

Posted by

Chaitali
  on April 11, 2006 11:11 AM

Good piece of writing Anuseh.

I have a slightly different view.

I believe everything in this world can be learned. We are taught to eat, to bathe, to talk, to walk to swim to behave, to read write and understand. We are even taught skills to live int he world. Courtesy many philosophers we are taught to live our lives in several realms, that ensures good health, in terms psychological, pysical, emotional health. Through, either, various healing practices or pratical excercises, we are taught since childhood to live.

But essentially we are nevr really given the guidelines to whom to seek for love. That is totally left to our instincts. I guess that is why when we are so close to our parents we start picking up the tips from them and whatever or whoever is a closest reminder of safety and security. Since there is no set formulae of love behaviour, speculation is rife, all the time.

What works for one doesn't work for another, and the stakes are too high so mentally we condition to believe anything close to the liking of our most favourite people is the safest bet. Cause that is our home ground. We have grown to learn how to tackle it.

For eg. If a father is domineering or a mother is a nag and if you find striking similarity in the spouses, I could see a reason. He/she has grown up to work his life around that situation so it deosn't seem weird. In fact it reminds him of home. Of safety. Cause by the time they grow up they have seen all the facets of such a character and are prepared to handle such a situation.

If I take my eg. --- typically my conversations with dad have been with his turn head (towards the TV or the book or some other work he is busy in, or simply his dinne plate). So when I talk to a man who is intently listening to me and all the while lookin at me, I feel unnerved, i turn my head away or look past his ears somewhere in the bank. It's difficult for me to talk passionately about something to the men, while directly looking into their eyes.

hee hee I guess I need to study this a bit.

Posted by

sangeeta
  on April 13, 2006 10:08 PM

Hi Sangeeta

Thanks. I'm not sure where the disagreement lies because I think Hendrix is pretty much in agreement with you. Like you say somewhere our father and mother continue to set the patterns of our attraction to the opposite (or same) sex.

I think you raise an interesting point when you say that the law of attraction as explained by Hendrix happens primarily because we are used to negotiating that particular pattern of relationship and so we find a certain comfort and security in it. I think you're probably right and you've given me something to think about.

:-)

Posted by

Anusheh
  on April 14, 2006 11:29 AM

Post a comment



(Note: Your email address will not be displayed on our site)


Remember Me?


Top 10 posts of all time

Syndicate our Site (RSS2.0)

Our Authors

Latest Comments

  • cris
      commented ( 2:10 PM Monday 28 April 2008) on
    HOW TRUE IS IT?
  • vijaya rajagopal
      commented ( 2:20 PM Sunday 16 March 2008) on
    how you see the it depends on that the spirituality would like to know more about this subject
  • Mieke
      commented ( 4:57 PM Monday 10 March 2008) on
    Dear Aachi, Thanks, found the book but haven't any idea how to order it from them, because it is only ...
  • Harb
      commented ( 4:00 PM Monday 10 March 2008) on
    Aachi, please write at the following email address: harb_singh@yahoo.com
  • Aachi
      commented (12:18 PM Monday 10 March 2008) on
    Dear Mieke, Harb, Lots of love to you.:) The book is in the Young Adult Fiction category of wisdomtree. Harb, ...
  • Mieke
      commented ( 5:17 PM Saturday 08 March 2008) on
    Hi Harb, I have been reading the blog just now. This one on one conversation is very straightforward and I ...
  • Mieke
      commented ( 5:15 PM Saturday 08 March 2008) on
    Dear Aachi, This is certainly a wonderful verse, straight from the heartphone :) Life, in all it's simplicity mostly offers ...
More Comments...

Opinion Poll

Latest News

World Top Blogs - Blog TopSites
Google
Web www.isitaboutsexblog.com

Related Websights

More...
Disclaimer | Project hosted by IFSHA | Designed by IFSHA Designs
Copyright © 2005 IFSHA and isitaboutsexblog.com. All rights reserved